May 6, 2005
-{11:57 am}-
Filed by trumwill from Office

At War With Eurasia

We got a department-wide email today about the dress code:

Due to the attire of a few individuals, we need to emphasize the dress code in regards to body piercings. It is very simple:

For men – No visible body piercings.

For women – one set of visible earrings, through the lobe of the ear. No other visible body piercings.

There are some employees with eyebrow, nose, or multiple piercings through their ears. These are examples of unacceptable attire at DocuTech, since it does not maintain a professional demeanor. If any employees are sporting such piercings, please address the problem immediately and have the individual remove the piercings while they are at our facilities.

A few notes:

  1. I’m almost sure that the ‘certain individuals’ who did this were never actually approached. This company, like most I’ve worked for, has a real passive-aggressive streak about it. Do something wrong and they won’t say anything to you personally. They’ll just say something to everyone.
  2. A quick poll in our cubicle row found zero (0) examples of men wearing having any piercings, zero (0) examples of anyone having eyebrow or nose piercings.
  3. However, there are a lot of girls that have multiple piercings in their ears. They have been wearing them since I got here roughly a year ago.
  4. And yet they do what they always do when instituting a new policy: “Things have always been this way.”
  5. And if they think they’re going to slip this regulation through when some women in company have had multiple earrings for decades, they’re nuts. I can’t help but think this sort of thing wouldn’t happen if there was even one woman in management.

I work for a chaotic company. I knew this when I signed on. When the report tracking progress changed four times in my first two weeks there, I learned it even further.

But one of the most aggregating things about my employer is how stubbornly they refuse to acknowledge that ‘no, we don’t have any established way of doing things.’ Reports has been pushing for established procedures for a long time.

But rules that have never been mentioned or much less enforced since I arrived are being touted as having always been in place. It’s not a matter of them being written down and ignored because FalStaff, a company that makes employer documentation, has no employee handbook. I still don’t even have an employment contract.

When it’s not written down, there is no dress code that isn’t being enforced. Absent writing, enforcement is the only way to discover existence of any regulations. A couple weeks ago we were told verbally that we were expected never to wear X, Y, and Z. Nobody flinched and everyone kept doing it. No one has said a word about it. The rule is not written down; it is not enforced; it does not exist. It is solely the province of a department email months down the line tut-tutting everyone for breaking a rule that was mentioned in passing and never enforced.

And, of course, requiring them to go home and change.

Or, more likely, just ignoring the rules we make, which is the only thing this company has ever always done.

5 Comments »

  1. I once worked for a company that would send you home if you failed to meet their dress code standards, which were mainly up to the individual department manager’s tastes. Lower level employees unspokenly agreed on a policy of going home and not coming back that day, pleading insufficient travel time or means. Eventually the managers began a program of selective blindness and a basic written code was finally circulated.
    Which of course we all ignored.
    Until the day Rexy came to work nearly nude… but that’s a story for another day.

    Comment by LeeAnn — May 6, 2005 @ 2:14 pm

  2. I’ve worked for employers that have allowed bluejeans and tshirts and others that insist on a tie. This one is really weird, cause they’ll allow the former but want the latter.

    Comment by trumwill — May 6, 2005 @ 5:12 pm

  3. The agency I just left (two hours ago!) was fairly lax about the dress code — no one ever said anything about my nose piercing or the multiple earrings. I probably could have worn jeans to work every day and no one would have said anything but I wasn’t brave enough to try.

    I worry that the next company won’t be so lax and I’ll have to take my nose ring out. Then I’ll cry…

    Comment by Andrea — May 6, 2005 @ 5:15 pm

  4. I think that any company that hires a lot of young people (like my current one) ought to consider some of the benefits of a more lax dress code (just as a company that hires a lot of 30-something women ought to consider more flexible schedules). Some minor compromises can keep a lot of good people around and can keep some folks devoted to their employer.

    Comment by trumwill — May 9, 2005 @ 8:29 am

  5. […] g of the meeting, which was how unobservant we have been of longstanding company policies (which aren’t written down). He went in to our unacceptable dress, our questionable work ethic, our i […]

    Pingback by Hit Coffee » HR Ambush — May 26, 2005 @ 2:51 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. | TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

NOTE Comments are encouraged if you have something to contribute. However, Hit Coffee is not a site for contentious or spiteful social commentary. For a more detailed explanation, feel free to read the Comments Policy. Comments that contain more than two links are sent to moderation and will be passed through as soon as I can. Blockquotes are discouraged for technical reasons (use italics). As a courtesy to commenters, I will clean up comments by deleting duplicates and HREFing links that are hard-coded.