I don’t have any new development or link to point to, but I was reminded of something recently that annoys the living crap out of me. Whenever some news comes through about some breakthrough in the search for a chemical contraceptive for men, a whole lot of women make the same comment: as if any man would take such a pill. Because, as they would have you understand it, men have no interest in contraception. It’s not as though pregnancy is a man’s problem. We’re all a bunch of Peter Pans without a care in the world while it’s women that have to concern themselves with such things. Of course, it gets worse when men agree with this.
There is, naturally enough, some truth to this. Women should not rely that men take the speculative pill reliably. Because, you know, they could fail. Then his failure becomes her problem (as well as his). I have to point out, though, this is something that is asked of men more often than one might think. Some women find the condom to be uncomfortable and so will ask men not to wear one. Some men have certain troubles with a condom. In these cases, the options are either to trust the woman when she says that she is taking the pill, withdrawal and risk outlining exactly how much you don’t trust her, or go home frustrated. There also comes a point in the relationship where continuing to wear a condom demonstrates a lack of trust unless the woman is on the same page.
I’m not saying that guys are uniquely put-upon here. I’m not saying that we have it tougher than women. To some extent that depends on the morals and philosophies of the participants. I mean, worst case it’s not something a guy has to worry about for nine and a half months or so after the deed. That should matter a lot more than it does to a lot of guys, but some people have pretty short time-horizons. Even if in most ways we have less urgency to our worry, in some ways we can have more to worry about (simply because we can’t make the “problem” go away, once conceived). We can have the best of all possible worlds (an abortion we supported but did not have to undergo or decide on) or the worst(a baby that we vociferously did not want from day one but have our wages garnished for 18 years to support).
But even to the extent that we can agree that it’s something that women have to worry about more than men, that does not mean that it is not something that men don’t have to worry about it. Some guys are extraordinarily detached from their responsibilities, and some guys will get away without having to pay a red cent in child support. But for guys that could not or would not forgo child support even for a child they did not want, this is some pretty serious stuff. And even if the more conscientious guys are not as worried about it as are the conscientious ladies, they’re still a lot more worried about it than are the less conscientious women who know that they can abort the problem away or just think that having a kid would be neat.
I guess where the women that say things like “men wouldn’t worry about it” are partly coming from is that they don’t have to worry about the less conscientious women. They just have to worry about the dudes. They don’t have to worry about some girl getting pregnant accidentally on purpose. They have to worry about some guy that just doesn’t give a flip. The standard of female behavior is defined first and foremost by their own conscientious behavior. The standard of male behavior, on the other hand, is far more varied. At most, these guys are as conscientious as they are. Often, they are not.
But make no mistake, there are a lot of guys that would be very interested in a pill for men. They would be very interested in having the freedom to not worry about a woman accidentally missing a pill. They would love to be able to tell the woman sitting across from the table that needs him to stick around because she might be pregnantbecause she might have missed taking her pill by an hour or two, “I don’t think that’ll be necessary because I didn’t miss mine.”

Perhaps I’m being overly cynical, but I suspect that some subset of those women are talking down the idea because they’re not terribly keen on giving up the power that nonverifiable contraceptives give them.
On a related note.
Comment by Brandon Berg — April 6, 2010 @ 9:37 pm
The thought had crossed my mind. Often I suspect it’s women that are scared to death of pregnancy that are exasperated because a lot of guys aren’t as scared as they are. But for some women - particularly those that use pregnancy or at least the claim of possible pregnancy as a manipulation tool - they do enjoy the power and probably the sense that since it is something that they are responsible for the ability to feel holier-than-thou towards men that, in one sense do not bear the burden of responsibility, but in another sense are comparatively powerless. Well, powerless may not be the word, but between a rock (”I know you say you take the pill, and I know we’ve been together for two years, but I am going to wear a condom anyway”) and a hard place (relying completely on her).
Comment by trumwill — April 6, 2010 @ 10:51 pm
How about an implanted RFID-type device that can sterilize or un-sterilize a man with just a coded transmission? (Basically, it would be an electronically-operated valve.) This would be a lot simpler than any man-pill. I can even see it being standard practice in the future.
Comment by Kirk — April 7, 2010 @ 9:37 am
It is a little interesting that women are so concerned about a male pill. The point of a male Pill is not to give women another birth control option. The point is to give men a birth control option. A woman who doesn’t trust the men she’s sleeping with to take the pill would still be able to use her own contraception. Perhaps who’s more reliable for that sort of thing is an issue in committed relationships, but outside of those, a technology that gives men more freedom does not take any freedom from women. Or at least no freedom that they ever claim to use.
I’ve wondered if suppressing ejaculation(not orgasm) wouldn’t be a better goal than suppressing sperm production. I mean, men are pretty optimized to produce sperm regardless of environmental influence. There aren’t any drugs I’ve heard of that reduce sperm production except as parcel of serious side effects of hardcore drugs that affect basic processes like chemotherapy drugs and DNA replication. There are relatively mild drugs like SSRIs that reduce ejaculation volume/frequency as an accidental side effect, so it is not that hard to do. A male Pill that Turned off ejaculation would also make verifying that a dude’s actually using and it’s working pretty simple.
Comment by rob — April 7, 2010 @ 1:28 pm