<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Critic Proofing</title>
	<link>http://hitcoffee.net/index.php/file/1928</link>
	<description>Addled thoughts of a quality assurance dope</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 09:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Kirk</title>
		<link>http://hitcoffee.net/index.php/file/1928#comment-7659</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:27:21 -0600</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hitcoffee.net/index.php/file/1928#comment-7659</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;Mulholland Drive&lt;/i&gt; made a few &quot;Best of the Decade&quot; lists. When are critics going to admit that they, like everyone else, simply don't understand any of David Lynch's movies?

Micro-people living in a dumpster?  You understood that?  Really?  Gimme a break.




   

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>Mulholland Drive</i> made a few &#8220;Best of the Decade&#8221; lists. When are critics going to admit that they, like everyone else, simply don&#8217;t understand any of David Lynch&#8217;s movies?</p>
	<p>Micro-people living in a dumpster?  You understood that?  Really?  Gimme a break.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DaveinHackensack</title>
		<link>http://hitcoffee.net/index.php/file/1928#comment-7660</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:40:43 -0600</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hitcoffee.net/index.php/file/1928#comment-7660</guid>
					<description>Web,

GI Joe went transitioned from a &quot;Real American Hero&quot; to an &quot;International Hero&quot; long before that movie. I think it made that transition back in the 80s, or possibly the early 90s at the latest. I don't think they even waited for the end of the Cold War. Incidentally, &lt;a href=&quot;http://thehackensack.blogspot.com/2009/08/more-robot-chicken-not-for-easily.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a few months back&lt;/a&gt; I posted the clip of Robot Chicken's great G.I. Joe spoof. One of the two or three funniest things I've seen on that show, possibly the funniest. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Web,</p>
	<p>GI Joe went transitioned from a &#8220;Real American Hero&#8221; to an &#8220;International Hero&#8221; long before that movie. I think it made that transition back in the 80s, or possibly the early 90s at the latest. I don&#8217;t think they even waited for the end of the Cold War. Incidentally, <a href="http://thehackensack.blogspot.com/2009/08/more-robot-chicken-not-for-easily.html" rel="nofollow">a few months back</a> I posted the clip of Robot Chicken&#8217;s great G.I. Joe spoof. One of the two or three funniest things I&#8217;ve seen on that show, possibly the funniest.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: trumwill</title>
		<link>http://hitcoffee.net/index.php/file/1928#comment-7661</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 01:05:26 -0600</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hitcoffee.net/index.php/file/1928#comment-7661</guid>
					<description>Kirk,

Mulholland Drive was lifted in part because of critical bias towards the original and unexpected. When reviewers see the same sorts of movies over and over again, they over-emphasize originality at the expense of the criteria used by regular movie-goers. Reviewers are often immune to the things that captivate less fanatical movie-goers.

That being said, the various oddities in MD were somewhat indicative of reality coming apart at the seems, which was a relatively central aspect of the movie. The witch behind the Denny's knockoff itself may or may not have represented something specific (and if it did, I agree that most people don't really know what), but the sheer unreality of it had its own significance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Kirk,</p>
	<p>Mulholland Drive was lifted in part because of critical bias towards the original and unexpected. When reviewers see the same sorts of movies over and over again, they over-emphasize originality at the expense of the criteria used by regular movie-goers. Reviewers are often immune to the things that captivate less fanatical movie-goers.</p>
	<p>That being said, the various oddities in MD were somewhat indicative of reality coming apart at the seems, which was a relatively central aspect of the movie. The witch behind the Denny&#8217;s knockoff itself may or may not have represented something specific (and if it did, I agree that most people don&#8217;t really know what), but the sheer unreality of it had its own significance.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: trumwill</title>
		<link>http://hitcoffee.net/index.php/file/1928#comment-7662</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 01:08:07 -0600</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hitcoffee.net/index.php/file/1928#comment-7662</guid>
					<description>Dave is right about GI Joe. In preparation of seeing the movie, I went back and watch some old episodes of GI Joe. They had already started downplaying the Americanness of the Joes.

On the other hand, I agree with Web that the movie was a veritable buffet of missed opportunities. I actually didn't think it was all that bad of a movie, as far as action movies go, but it wasn't really a GI Joe movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dave is right about GI Joe. In preparation of seeing the movie, I went back and watch some old episodes of GI Joe. They had already started downplaying the Americanness of the Joes.</p>
	<p>On the other hand, I agree with Web that the movie was a veritable buffet of missed opportunities. I actually didn&#8217;t think it was all that bad of a movie, as far as action movies go, but it wasn&#8217;t really a GI Joe movie.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

