Most people, if you ask them what they think of the police, will tell you they respect people who take up that job and protect the public.
Most people are liars.
I’m going to go out on a limb here and admit: my actual respect for police/sheriffs has gone downhill over the years to the point where it is virtually nonexistent.
Where I think this comes from has very little to do with the actual police in question. The job done by the police hasn’t changed that much. I have specific respect for the officers who do the needed things - investigating crimes, dealing with gangs/gang violence, and actually keeping the cities and neighborhoods safe(r). I do not for a moment subscribe the the Jesse Jackson/Al Sharpton school of “cops are racist”, nor do I believe as Barack Obama does that police who participate in federally-authorized and organized enforcement actions are involved in “terror.”
What has stolen my respect for cops is far more fundamental; a small, day-to-day realization that the lowest level of the system - traffic enforcement in particular - is hopelessly corrupt. Will has spoken on this a couple of times (also most recently).
In my life, I’ve risked traffic tickets precisely twice. Once was on a highway about two hours out of Colosse. There’s a spot where the state highway requires a cloverleaf off-ramp to remain on the highway; unfortunately for unwary motorists, they also “happen” to change the speed limit from 65 to 60 on the segment over the bridge, and there’s a good mile span where motorists will accelerate back up to their original speed before seeing the new sign. Thus I was pulled over by a sheriff on a slow night for “going 63 in a 60 zone” with out of state plates, before he saw my Southern Tech ID and realized that I’d easily be able to make the court date and let me off with a warning. To be fair to this one, he warned me that there was another spot with a similar setup about an hour past where I was, so that I wouldn’t get stopped there too. I’ve no doubt that had I not been a poor college student, however, he simply would have hit me with a ticket and I’d have been stuck in the unenviable position of either (a) trying to get back for a court date or (b) pleading guilty by mail.
The second time, I was coming home to the SoTech dorms late at night, and one of STPD’s rent-a-cops decided he needed to make quota (and/or some time with the new girl on the force). So he pulled me over ostensibly for “running a red light” (not guilty), then called for “backup” and proceeded to “show [her] how we do this paperwork” while his hand was working its way over her derriere. Apparently she was pretty cute to look at, enough so that he got the model, color, and number of doors of my car wrong (the only thing he successfully identified was the license plate number and the fact that it was a Ford).
When I went in for the court date - which he “conveniently” scheduled three weeks after semester’s end, but fortunately I was taking summer courses - I was told in no uncertain terms by the DA’s assistant that he didn’t care how much the cop got wrong on the ticket, because he was confident that the judge would know I had done “something” wrong and that I ought to just pay up.
A few years later, Colosse had a short uproar when the current Mayor let slip in a city council meeting that the city was short on money, very specifically because “CPD ticket revenue has not met its goals.” In other words, while they skirt the federal ban on having official ticket “quotas”, they establish a minimum amount of revenue that the Police Department is required to generate from traffic tickets - by hook or by crook. As everyone in Colosse knows, all the cops have “unofficial” quotas. You can see them when it’s close to monthly review, staking out spots and setting up ambushes, 6-7 squad cars parked in one underpass or in a sequence down the roadway, making sure each officer in their unit meets the “unofficial quota” so as not to get an administrative blemish on their monthly performance review.
The end result of this misbehavior - whether by CPD, by the lone sheriff with a radar gun in rural areas who falsifies the radar speed listed to increase fines, or by a local board or state legislature that passes laws such that it’s actually more expensive to fight such a falsified ticket than simply to pay - is a slow but continual degradation of the respect and trust that officers need to do the rest of their job. Knowing that an officer has in 99% likelihood committed perjury over a traffic ticket by falsifying court documents, am I likely to trust their word on other subjects? I’m pretty sure I am not. Am I likely to believe that a traffic court judge is actually a fair arbiter? Of course not - from experience, I know that even as they lie to your face otherwise, a traffic court judge is going to take a cop at his word no matter what he says and is in the business of getting as many people to pay tickets as possible. They’ve gone from being a brake and sanity check on the system, to being just another corrupt cog.
And since this lowest level of the system is so corrupt, I can at least understand why it is that people believe the higher levels are equally as corrupt. After all, every judge and official in the higher portions of the system started out as either one of, or supporting and rubber-stamping for, the badged highwaymen.

Traffic courts aren’t going to help because they too make money off of traffic tickets. Most tickets come with substantial fees tacked onto the basic fine amounts. These fees are major revenue sources for court systems.
Comment by Peter — July 21, 2008 @ 7:44 am
“…nor do I believe as Barack Obama does that police who participate in federally-authorized and organized enforcement actions are involved in ‘terror.’”
I haven’t heard about this - care to post a reference?
Comment by Linus — July 21, 2008 @ 9:18 am
I do not for a moment subscribe the the Jesse Jackson/Al Sharpton school of “cops are racist”, nor do I believe as Barack Obama does that police who participate in federally-authorized and organized enforcement actions are involved in “terror.”
It’s odd for you to be so dismissive of police corruption in one area and then believe that it is fundamentally corrupt and systemic in another. Top, bottom, these are all the same people. The traffic cops are responding to incentives sent down from the top. While the notion that there are institutional directives from the top to target minorities and poor people may be inaccurate, the notion that they’re targeted at the lower levels to the same effect would certainly be worthy of consideration, no?
I remember thinking the same thing when you defended a cop getting one-year probation for killing a handcuffed suspect in a fit of rage.
I think that it’s a mistake to assume that the cops are dealing with you (and people like you) in a fundamentally corrupt and unfair manner and then to start with the assumption (or complain that others are starting from a different assumption) when they’re dealing with someone else.
I think of everything a cop goes through on a day-to-day basis, I think of all the crap police are forced to put up with, I think of all the times that the justice system assumes the worst of police while pretending that an obvious criminal is the “victim” of something, and I for one am glad that at least once now, the justice system didn’t decide to fuck the cop over completely.
This strikes me as odd that you would be dismissive of the notion of police abuse when it pertains to ethnic groups and then condemn the police as fundamentally corrupt when it comes to an area where you are vulnerable. These are largely the same people and organizations we’re talking about. If they are fundamentally corrupt, there isn’t a whole lot of reason that they would take a more aggressive attitude towards disadvantaged groups.
Comment by trumwill — July 21, 2008 @ 1:56 pm
I have no particular opinion on the topic, but one reason to believe that this might be a unique case is the incentives involved. Police departments get money for writing tickets, but they don’t get money for beating up minorities. Likewise, officers are (AFAIK) rarely disciplined for writing too many questionable tickets, but kill a black man in the process of subduing him, and there will be hell to pay, even when it was justified.
Comment by Brandon — July 22, 2008 @ 1:31 am
The only problem I ever had with a cop, was on Interstate 10 going through Louisiana. The show “60 minutes” had a story about how parishes along there confiscate hundreds of cars every year, and I’m pretty sure that’s why I was pulled over.
I’m convinced that the only reason I was able to keep my car, is because I refused to consent to a search. Once you consent to that, you give the cop an opportunity to “find” drugs in your car. (They can keep the car even after dropping charges against you. The only way to get it back is to file a civil suit against the department.)
That’s why I think it’s important to NEVER give consent to a search. Just say “no”.
Comment by Kirk — July 22, 2008 @ 3:19 am
Well,there is a reason why cops are called pigs. They are brute, cowardish and ignorant.
Comment by Gannon — July 22, 2008 @ 7:12 am
Brandon,
Yeah, I realized after my comment that it was probably unfair because there are distinctions that can be made. I also agree that many complaints about cops declaring war on minorities are ridiculously overstate. Even so I think that we do have to keep in mind that the same cop that we sometimes instinctively defend as good people trying to do a tough job are the same ones that are pulling us over.
Comment by trumwill — August 2, 2008 @ 4:20 am
Kirk, Louisiana has a pretty awful reputation in the South, particularly when it comes to out-of-state drivers. My brother was pulled over for going too slow… five mph under the speed limit driving an RV. I was reminded about your comment about allowing a cop to search your car when I watched this video last night.
Comment by trumwill — August 2, 2008 @ 4:24 am